How's this for a headline:
"Federal judge rules the proposed North Carolina license plate unconstitutional." This plate; it's called "Choose Life":
This blithering idiot U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox - and I do mean IDIOT - made a ruling stating that the state cannot offer a viewpoint opposing baby-killing, er, abortion, without offering a plate which allows an opposing viewpoint. In short, there has to be a plate supporting abortion.
Now, why am I calling this man an idiot?
He's a Federal judge. His first duty is to uphold the Constitution of the United States. And there's the rub. Abortion is fully protected under the Constitution, it says so.
Where does it say so?
Right there in the Fourth Amendment, say the baby killing, er, abortion supporters. And it reads:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Where's the abortion protection clause? Am I to get this straight, that a fetus possibly committed a crime, and a warrant is needed for its arrest? Those baby-killers, er, abortion-supporters, always use this amendment to justify their cause. That's forty-million dead kids since 1973. Some justification.
But while they stuff the Fourth Amendment down everyone's throats with its non-existent clause, they want the public to forget about a certain line in the Constitution which throws a monkey wrench right at them:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of
Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America."
It's called the Preamble; it's the very first paragraph in the Constitution. "Posterity" in this context, means "those yet to be born." And it has a precedent in the Declaration of Independence, which states that life is "inalienable." Any questions? Or are there still those people out there who are so dense or so stupid they cannot comprehend this one small fact?
The case was brought before Judge Idiot by our good "friends" at the ACLU, that "respected" organization which thinks a baby is just a crop of jelly inside the womb, and has no right to life at all, despite the Declaration and the Constitution. "This is a great victory for the free speech rights of all North
Carolinians, regardless of their point of view on reproductive freedom,"
said Chris Brook, Legal Director of the ACLU-NCLF. "We
would have made the exact same argument if the situation was reversed,
and the state planned on issuing a pro-choice plate while not offering
one expressing the opposite point of view." It's a "great victory for free speech rights" he said. Shutting down someone else's life is not a great victory, in or out of the womb. What the ACLU wanted, and wanted very clearly, was to prevent North Carolinians from expressing their views on abortion - which is to say they weren't allowed to show opposition to it on a license plate.
And just what could be the opposing plate that should have been offered? Here you go, ACLU and all of you libs out there who want to keep abortion on demand. Propose this plate for North Carolina...it's called "Choose Death":
It's what they wanted. Now explain to the world how this crop of jelly on the plate just so happens to look like an unborn baby.