Friday, June 19, 2015

Liberalism from the Sewer

During Obama's Administration we have had several incidents in which lives were lost because some nutcase decided to pack a gun, and what happened in Charleston, South Carolina on June 17, 2015 is no different.  Nine people are dead after a gunman walked into a predominately black church, sat for about an hour listening to a Bible study, then got up and opened fire.

And in the hours before he was captured, the liberal establishment just had to get up and state that he was from the right, like every other time before.  Our website is no different in attracting liberal attention, and this clown has to come in and post the following:

I am unfamiliar with American English but does "Sparse" in BE translate to "bigtime" in AE? I can find no evidence that he was a video game player, please enlighten me? Also you miss out some relevant facts, mainly that the weapon used was legally owned by the alleged shooter and was obtained without background checks which would have confirmed he was a right wing, yes right wing, fanatic. No gun no murder, relevant background checks, no murder. --AeyupT 18:29, 18 June 2015 (EDT)
PS. Andy, I thought you a supporter of Apartheid? Your comments around the time of Mandela's death would suggest this. So this young fanatic had similar views to you. Worm out of that one.--AeyupT 18:32, 18 June 2015 (EDT) 

What this guy is attempting to do is, one: declare that we as a website are racist in our outlook and beliefs, and two: declaring that the shooter was "right wing, yes right wing, fanatic" solely by the fact that he had in his possession a legally-owned gun.

I am not going to speculate on whether or not the alleged shooter - Dylann Roof - was a video game fanatic or spent his time snorting coke up the wazoo; I don't know his personal life.  The only thing that can be gleaned with any reasonable certainty is the facts already established.  As for the moron who posted the above edit in Conservapedia, people need to give him a phone call; he might have the winning numbers to the next Powerball game, or could demonstrate time-travel or have a cancer cure or have whatever else constitutes the bovine scatology that he pulled out of his front yard sewer.

But let's see if the facts of the incident reveal right-wing, aka conservative, or liberal ideology at play here.

Fact number one: the alleged shooter was racist.
Yep, he hates blacks.  That seems to be indisputable.  He shot nine of them dead in a church, told the survivors that he wanted a race war because "black people are taking over the country".  His Facebook page showed him wearing a jacket with the flags of Rhodesia and South Africa, both during the days of apartheid when blacks were subjected to white rule and made to be stepped on.  He also sported a license plate on the front of his car, which said "Confederate States of America"; it had images of Confederate flags as well.  It means he supported the slave-owning ideology of the Confederate South prior to and during the Civil War.

Now, is this racism a conservative trait, or a liberal trait?  This country was founded on the prospect that all men are created equal, but there were slaves in America at the time those words were written; our Founding Fathers had hoped that slavery would gradually die off, but within a generation of 1776 the Democratic Party wanted to keep slaves, spread slavery, fight like hell to hold on to slavery, and when they lost the Civil War they created the "Jim Crow" laws, the Ku Klux Klan, segregation, and anything else to remind American blacks who was the "masters".  This master-slave mentality still permeates Democrats today, and a great many liberals right now, or didn't you hear about "politically correct" speech, the forced removal of Bibles from our schools, or blacks shooting each other in droves in Democrat-controlled cities like Detroit and Chicago?  How about while liberals like former Congressman Barney Frank, who thinks "watermelon" should be handed to blacks in exchange  for their votes?

Yes, racism is a liberal trait, and a liberal rule.

Fact number two: the alleged shooter hated God.
Yes, that's also indisputable.  If he can walk into a church, stay a spell, then get up and kill, he demonstrates that he has no fear of God at all, or does not believe in Him in any way whatsoever.  That makes him an atheist.  Who is it right now that is working overtime to prevent you from carrying a Bible in school?  Who is working overtime to prevent you from preaching in a public park?  Who is working overtime to keep firestations or city halls or police departments from displaying a Christmas tree?  What kind of individual is it that will sue you if you carried out your First Amendment rights to religion?  It isn't the conservative who's doing it; it's the liberal.  It's isn't the conservative who's shoving the atheist "no God" doctrine down our throats; it's the liberal.

Yes, atheism is a liberal trait.  Hatred of church is a liberal trait.

Fact number three: the "gun free zone"
Who are the champions of "gun free" zones?  Liberals are.  They don't want anyone with a gun anywhere near where these zones are - anyone who's a law-abiding citizen, that is.  And they make these laws to keep it that way, and this includes the church in Charleston where the shooting took place.  South Carolina code  Ann.§ 23-31-215 specifically states that no one is allowed to carry a gun "...on school premises (including day care and preschool facilities), in law enforcement offices or facilities, in court facilities, at polling places on election days, in churches or other religious sanctuaries, or in hospitals or medical facilities."  The shooter couldn't have cared less about that law, or any other law he broke the moment he pulled out his weapon.

Unfortunately, the creation of a law that prevents a law-abiding citizen from pulling out his own weapon and stopping that shooter cold is a liberal trait.

Fact number four: the shooter's hypocrisy
This is also indisputable.  He hated blacks, but of his 82 friends on his Facebook page, one third of them were black.  Now, how could he be racist like that and still have black friends?  At the very least, he's a liar; at worst, he's a hypocrite, saying one thing and doing another, the murders notwithstanding.  In Conservapedia we've stated numerous times - and backed up by evidence - just how hypocritical liberals can be, and how much lying they can actually do.  It is deplorable when anyone does it, and by right it should be condemned, but it has to be noted that lying and hypocrisy is the rule with liberals.  They expect to get away with both.

So there it is, a despicable individual who murdered nine in cold blood, and a moronic, no-nothing clown has to frame him as a right-wing fanatic when he was following the policies and rules set down on the liberal side of the fence.  Racism, hatred of God and church, hatred of your fellow man, rules keeping fellow citizens from mounting a defense against such people, lying and hypocrisy, all come from that sewer called liberalism.  Whether or not they like to hear it is their problem, but we will tell it like it is.

Maybe some common sense drilled into their cement heads will prevent another mass shooting from taking place.

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Isn't That Amazing!


I want you to picture this in your mind.  You're watching television, late at night.  You're bored, you have insomnia, and the Tonight Show is over with.

You turn it to the Science Channel.  Liberals love the Science Channel.

The program that's on is How It's Made, where you learn how shirt buttons, dry dog food, air mattresses, and walk-behind lawn mowers are made.  That should be sufficient to bore you right to sleep.

You're done with the shirt buttons, then a commercial.

Since this is late at night, this is no ordinary commercial; it's an infomercial, with what appears to be the same loud-mouthed fast talking salesguy who did the infamous "Moxy-Clean" or "Veg-A-Matik" or "Maxi-Hair" or some stupid appliance that is always vital to home kitchen operations.  It's something that a liberal would concoct.

And in short, YOU HAVE TO HAVE IT!!!

"INTRODUCING

The amazing wonder drug you've been waiting for!  It doesn't slice, dice, whip, puree, or does anything for you within the kitchen.

Are you tired of the at-home drudgery?  Do you long to be served on a silver platter?  Do you long years for a better you?  Do you want to be the life of the party?

Introducing Don Soreal's "Lib-A-Change".  Yes, "Lib-A-Change", where your half-witted dreams of being a blithering idiot liberal become a reality.  Packed with B-vitamins and Don's secret sauce, why you can change from....

An Olympic gold medal he-man athlete to the sexiest woman alive!

A white woman to a black woman and there and back again!

A white woman to Native American to the U.S. Senate!

Cop killer to national celebrity, death row optional!

You'll be the most popular guy - or gal, or both - on the block with "Lib-A-Change".  Isn't that amazing!

Act now and we'll send as a free gift to you a stack of 24 MEGA-JOINTS, grown from the finest Colorado pot dealers in the state.  Call within one hour and we'll DOUBLE THE OFFER!  That's right, a whopping TWO bottles of "Lib-A-Change" and 48 MEGA-JOINTS, all with our money-lost guarantee, and guaranteed access to both bathrooms anywhere in North America!

And it's only yours for 23 easy payments of $595.95; food stamp and major credit cards are accepted!"

After watching that commercial, you chuck a brick through the screen - if you're a conservative.  If you're a liberal, why, you search the pants, pull out the wallet, and phone the number on the back of the food stamp card.

Gotta check your balance!


Monday, June 15, 2015

Getting Away With It in Liberal Land


David Sweat and Richard Matt, escaped murderers
I and a number of people have stated for years - with 100% accuracy - that liberals are mentally-deranged nutjobs who destroy everything they touch and make the rest of us pay for it. 

Take for example the inauguration of Barack Obama in Washington, D.C. in January, 2009.  It is documented that of the 1,000,000-plus attendees of the inauguration, 1,000,000-plus of them were liberal.  It is also documented that every single one of them tossed onto the ground 100 tons of trash.  They trashed the place.  At the same time, just what was coming out of their own mouths?

"We liberals just love the environment."

And then there's the State of New York.

You do remember New York.  Used to have a conservative governor; now it's a liberal one named Cuomo.  He hates conservatism, and he demonstrates it repeatedly.  New York City used to have a conservative mayor; now it's a liberal one, someone named DeBlasio, DeBlastoid, DeSantaClaus or something like that.  He hates conservatism as well.

Now, what is the difference between conservatism and liberalism, you might ask?

Conservatism is the tried and tested, against the untried and untested, to paraphrase Abraham Lincoln in his Cooper Union speech.  Conservatism is law and order, the protection of traditions, family, church; American values, language, borders, customs.

"As I would not be a slave," Lincoln said, "I would not be a master."  Unfortunately, liberalism demands a master over someone else.  You say something they don't like, they shut you down; they call you racist, they call you hate-filled, they call you bigot.  "Politically correct" speech is controlled speech, invented by liberals to silence others.  They believe in the "master-slave" relationship.  Who do you think picked up the trash that they threw on the ground that day in Washington?  Wasn't them.

Liberalism is about power over others.  Liberalism is about no responsibility and no accountability; they STILL have to blame Bush for almost everything.  If you speak up for traditional marriage, or for Christianity, or for simply raising an American flag on your front lawn, you get sued, you get hate mail, you get slandered, you get libeled, or if you're in the military, you get court-marshaled. 

I did mention "master-slave" relationship.  Only in a liberal society would they prosecute anyone who dares to be a white guy dressing in "blackface", but when it's a white female liberal who pretends to be black and joins the NAACP in Washington State, why, they just have to look the other way; they have to "praise her"; they have to "glorify her".  The liberal always gets away with it.  They have the "good" intentions, or so they say.

So, with that in mind, there's conservative-hating New York, both state and city, under two of the most left-leaning liberals they have ever had.  They both had made sure there was an attack on police officers; they both made sure that criminals were allowed to get away with whatever it was they wanted to do.  White cop kills black man, why he's punished every which way to Sunday, and more; black man kills white cop, he's lauded as a hero.  Black man kills black man, he's ignored.  Large numbers of blacks kill large numbers of other blacks...it's ignored.  Like in Detroit, like in Chicago, both cities controlled by liberals, both cities with high murder rates.  And they love gun control...where the guns are controlled by criminals that is.

Anyone kills any cop?  The liberal lavishes the praise.

You follow this?  Liberals let criminals get away with it.  Crime is sky-rocketing in New York, and due to control of both state and city by the left-leaning liberal establishment led by Cuomo and DeWhatsHisName.

Liberals let criminals get away with it.

Does that mean that two such criminals - both murderers - who recently escaped from a prison in New York near the Canadian border, will be allowed to just walk away with a pat on the back?  In the liberal mindset, why not?  One of them murdered a sheriff's deputy; should the liberals now give him a trophy as well?  The other dismembered his former boss; should the liberals reward him with a masters degree in the culinary arts?  How about the woman who helped them do it?  A speaking engagement at free love seminars?

And right now other New York citizens are living in fear, the possibility that both of these killers may break into one of their homes and kill them for their car, their clothes, their money, or whatever else the liberal feels they should be allowed to get away with.  The husband of that woman who helped them escape just found out that he was going to be killed by them; will liberals condemn him for finding out?  Will they demand that he be killed?  I wouldn't put it past them, such is the liberal mental derangement that is always on full display.

The fear is multiplied by the fact that it is the liberal - Cuomo, DeFinkelstein, and others like them - are working very hard to remove guns from the citizens' hands.  Will they publicly burn the Constitution next?

Only criminals have rights in their minds.  And it is the liberal who demands they get away with it. 


Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Liberals love hate

Don't you just love being right sometimes?

Oh the feeling of it all.  The debate.  The proof.  The clear victory.  The sight of your opponent being turned in to a whimpering blob of jelly before he screams obscenities at you.  That's when you know he lost the argument.  The obscenities.  The name-calling.  Good liberal stra-tee-gee.  Hurl the insults when you lose.

Like it really matters.

So, I'm sitting here and out comes the insults from a troll who's just got to hide his tracks in whatever part of the internet he has to hide in.  He must have lost the argument some time ago, so now he has to break into the site and say this collection of words that are classics from the self-proclaimed "tolerant" left:

Rot in hell, Jewboy. Also, have you completely stopped making any "constructive" edits? -h@xx0r1997 NamRed

Or this one:
This gets more fun each time I do it. Cry yourself to sleep Karajew -h@xxx0r1997 

Or this one:
Hey hey Karajew. How dey hangin? I'm having so much fun here. I'll stick around. -h@xx0r1997 Drgonzo

Or this one:
Aren't you tired of banning me? Not bad for a 50 year old technologically inept Navyfag. Actually pulling my IP. I'm a g0@ts3 exorcist from India.I can help with your jewg0ld problem. Sincerely, BobbySands

As you can tell from these, he's a hate-filled liberal with a bigotry problem.  Antisemitic.  He hates Jews.  Just like a Nazi.  Ain't it great?  A liberal Nazi has just proven our point.

We always hear from the liberal media just how tolerant liberals are.  Like Mylee...uh, Myler...er, Mylar...that Cyrus kid, posted in a magazine today; she just had to strip down and call her own parents "conservative-ass mother--kers."  Why?  For the crime of being Christian, it seams.  That's the new thing these days, the tolerant, loving liberal left going after Christians.  Such a paradox. 

It is because they hate.  They hate with a passion that has no bounds.  They hate your thoughts, your speech, your religion, your property; if they can't steal it or burn it down, they try to elect some other clown to office so he could use a fountain pen to take it away.  And when these liberal clowns do cast that vote for their "man" to help run our lives into the ground, it is through this "man" that these individual liberals speak with their little minds as one mind.

A racist, hate-filled mind.

Just watch the video.  Former liberal Democrat Congressman Barney Frank and his "husband" and a bunch of others show off just how racist they really are. 


They offer watermelon to blacks for their votes.  They might as well pull out the "N"-word, such is their contempt for black Americans. 

But then again, they are the tolerant, loving liberal left.

They love hating so much it's disgusting.  Proving us to be right once again!

Saturday, May 9, 2015

Minimum Wage And Democrats Are For The Poor Myth

Republicans want to cut taxes to benefit the rich. You've heard it said before. The drone army, programmable Democrat talking points that are just more flat out lies. Repeated over and over again, it becomes ingrained Democrat thinking.

Lean forward and collect an unemployment check.
The truth is that both political parties are for the rich. The only difference is one party gives lip service to the poor, not actual support. Minimum wage is now the Democrat Party presidential race agenda item. Create more jobs? Nah. Raise minimums will end the poor's financial struggle? Absolutely not. Democrats and their class warfare agenda is so easy to laugh at. Millionaire politicians are so out of touch with the needs of average Americans.

The truth is that raising the minimum wage to absurd hourly rates will kill jobs for the very people who need them. Liberal San Francisco and Seattle are learning this first hand. They mandated by Democrat law to raise wages $15. per hour. Businesses close because they can't absorb the added costs. But it sure makes a socialist feel good as they drive their BMW into their gated community.

Minimum wage was never intended to be a lifetime job, it is an entry level position. Obamanomics has the most able body people on government assistance in 3 decades, nearly 94 million people not working. Democrats blame Capitalism when it's their policy that is not free market friendly. In fact, their regulatory burdens placed on the market is making the economy worse. Tax cuts for the rich, as unpleasant as it is made out to be, actually creates jobs because they are small business owners that invest the money into growing business. Redistribute money from those who work to those that don't work is punishing success. In addition, America has had several years of record tax collection. A half of trillion dollars in April and the economy hasn't been this bad since the Great Depression.

In conclusion, things will get worse before they get better because morons are in charge.

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Sinning and Sweet Cakes

Flickr

Once upon a time, a group of men dragged a woman in a Jerusalem street, and dropped her before a man seated against a wall, a man who busied himself with poking a finger around in the dirt rather than look up at the men.

The crowd looked at him for a moment, and one of them said "this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act."

The seated man - Jesus - still did nothing.  So a question was directed at him. 

"Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?"

Then Jesus looked up, looked at everyone in the crowd directly, and said "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her."

That was in the Gospel of John, chapter 8.  It's also one of the New Testament passages that liberals repeatedly cite for Jesus' level of tolerance.  He did forgive the woman for adultery.

But what else did He say?  That's important, because He said it a lot throughout the Gospels.

"Sin no more."  Translated into modern English from the language of the King James, and you get this:

"Don't sin anymore!"  "QUIT SINNING!"  

Got that, people?  The Bible speaks against sin of any kind, and sin includes homosexuality.  God made the gay person, but He never made him gay.  God made the thief, but He never made him steal; God made the...you get the picture.

So, what is the point of this:  Before I get to that, here is the first marriage, way back when it involved Adam and Eve:

Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. (Genesis 2:24)

Now, what did Jesus say about marriage?

And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (Matthew 19:4-6)

Did anyone in the Bible support the notion of Adam and Steve?  No.  In fact, you cannot find anything in the Bible where it is authorized; you can find plenty in there condemning it, but absolutely nothing supporting it.  So if anyone begs to differ, well, they just haven't read the Bible, or they prefer to pick and choose and twist.

So, the only remedy is to renounce the sin - get rid of it, let go of it, throw it in the trash can - and allow Jesus to be your savior.  That's what Peter said to do in Acts 2:38; that's what Paul said to do throughout most of the New Testament.  And I'm not singling out homosexuality as the only sin here.  If you hate people, if you curse, backbite, steal, murder, jaywalk, sput on someone, swipe so much as a paperclip from someone's desk, well, that's just as much sin as the gay act in God's eyes.  And if you don't renounce it, if you don't accept Jesus, you're just not a Christian, and you will never get eternal life in Heaven.  Period.

So, there's Melissa, the sweet cake maker.  She decided not to make a wedding cake for a homosexual couple, a cake that clearly stated a celebration of their "marriage."  Why?  Because as a Christian she would have been forced to abandon her beliefs and support something that is clearly in violation of God's laws. 

The state of Oregon claimed discrimination against the homosexual couple.  Melissa was charged, fined, sued, called filthy words, received death threats, and so on.  

Here's what an outsider is clearly seeing.  Oregon passed a law that says you cannot discriminate against anyone while operating a business.  This law apparently DEMANDS you set aside your personal religious beliefs when dealing with a customer, or else.

The Oregon law is also unconstitutional, and the last time this writer read it, Article 6 of the Constitution clearly says:

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Constitution sits OVER the state laws of Oregon; it's supremacy cannot be challenged, unless Oregon chooses to leave the Union.  Fat chance on that happening.

And if the Constitution is supreme over Oregon laws, Melissa and anyone else like her cannot be made to violate her own religious beliefs.  The First Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Melissa has a right to religion.  Melissa has a right to free speech.  Melissa has a right to assemble with like-minded people.  So, you people in Oregon, and those people who like to spit upon Melissa, who authorized YOU to remove those First Amendment rights from her? 

While you're sitting there spouting off obscenities at a baker, you're forgetting there's going to be a higher showdown later, in the Supreme Court.

And while you're sitting there demanding Melissa cave in to what your "version" of Christianity should be, you forget that the individual whom you claim is all "love and tolerance" will sit in judgement against you, and it will be based on your own rejection of Him; your own hatred, intolerance, and bigotry directed against Christians in general and Melissa in particular will definitely be used against you.

So, quit the sinning and accept Him.  The offer is free.

But the offer expires when you do.  And when that happens, it's too late.

P.S.

If you want to order any of those sweet cakes, her site is here:  http://www.sweetcakesweb.com/



 

Friday, April 24, 2015

Income Inequality, The Nonsense From Liberals Is Neverending.

America has a unique role in the world when it comes to the rights of their people. The specific word "equality" does not appear anywhere in either the Declaration or in the Constitution. You will find the word "equal" as in all men are created equal and the equal protection of the laws. Equality is nowhere to be found and for good reason. It's an invention of liberals and Marxists.
Mindless drones demand more money.

Income Inequality is pushed relentlessly by rich Democrats, which is irony of the first degree. They claim to be for the poor and for the middle class while being driven around in limos and eating caviar in their $10 million dollar home. Those people are truly hypocrites but even worse, they are fascists. Their policies, their push is hurting the very people they claim to defend. Anybody that studied Marxism knows that the caste system, classifying people according to their wealth, creates resentment and division. This furthers the liberal agenda to create an endless stream of victims that need to rely on Democrats for help. It's their standard method of operation. We are not all Americans as the term equal in the Constitution refers. According to Democrats, we are rich/poor, we have white/black skin pigmentation, skilled/unskilled, we are victims/winners. It's bullcrap but common thinking from liberals.

Equality of opportunity is the only true use of the word that is non-divisive. Everybody has a fair shot to be what they want, to pursue their dreams. The world has had poor and rich from the beginning and it shall be that way until the end. Hate and envy of others does nothing to improve your life. Self determination, freedom and liberty is the best system available. Capitalism not Marxism is the champion of equality. 

For equality of incomes, look no further than to Cuba and North Korea. Everybody is equally poor and miserable. They just so happen to be Communist nations, what a coincidence.