Thursday, March 26, 2015

Robin Hood in LaLa Land

Robin Hood, as played by Errol Flynn from the 1938 film

In liberal la-la land - or Wackyland, whichever fits better - everything is the opposite.  Up is down, in is out, red is blue, light is dark, right is wrong.  Which is kinda great when you confront a liberal with facts; it's outrageous fun watching their heads explode!

As it was with this guy, online in a chat room somewhere in IRC central, and this guy...I'll call him Otis...decides he wants to pontificate about the need for expanded liberalism, specifically in the raising of taxes so that money can be collected and given to those who like to sit around in their underwear somewhere in Otisburg.  What was it he said?

"We're gonna rob from the rich, and give to the poor."

Wow.  A time honored liberal battle cry.  "And where did that battle cry originate?" I asked.

"Robin Hood."

That's where it came from?  I asked point blank about it's origins, and he said yes, robbing those rich folks and giving the loot to the poor comes from Robin Hood.  He must be correct.  He is a liberal after all.  Don't facts have a liberal bias?

Fine then.  I wanted some names.

"Just who did Robin Hood steal from?"


"They have to have some names, Otis."

"Uhhhh...the Sheriff of Nottingham.  Prince John.  Guy of Gis..."

"And they were...what?"

"Uhhhh, government officials."

And the tax money; I had to ask about the tax money.  "And what exactly did Robin steal from them, and what did he do with it?"

"Uhhhh, it was tax money stolen from the people to make them rich, and Robin merely took it back."

And Otis sat there for a moment or two, letting what he just said sink in, memories of The Adventures of Robin Hood starring Errol Flynn and a cast of a dozen...or did he see the cheaper remake with the Costner guy?  Anyway, when he realized just what he said had the opposite position of what he believed in...well...

"YOU DUMB #4i^%# SUCKWAD$$(*^et^ DIPJERK*&%$& KISS MY $^&&e^ BOOBTWAT@$(&$MEGAoi&^%^$DWEEB*%#^&*......"  the screen just couldn't take the foul language that poured out of Otis' feeble mind - it was just cartoonish, kinda like this individual, imported all the way from Toontown:

So, what's the point?

Robin Hood went up against an abusive, over-taxing central government - the kind of government that steals to line their own pockets, and he returned the tax money back to the people.

Who taxes people up the wazoo?  Liberals.
Who whines and complains about taxes being cut?  Liberals.
Who are some of the richest people in politics as a result?  Liberals.

Who demands tax cuts and the money returned to the people?  Conservatives.

And if you get a swearing, cussing, scatterbrained, latte-drinking, food-stamp abusing whiner who thinks up is down, big is small, left is right, and about to pretend to board the boat for the next save the whales campaign, chances are that he just had a field day snorting up the dust lining the streets of Wackyland.

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Wackyland and Bowe Bergdahl

Imagine having a conversation with a liberal.  A died-in-the-wool liberal.  Or is that "dyed"?  Who knows with these clowns; everything is topsy-turvy with them.  What's up is down; bad is good; right is wrong; in is get the picture.   Just what sort of people have these distorted viewpoints of the world?  Where do they get their training and education, if they indeed received any?  Just what on earth could drive someone to think that a convicted cop killer should get a free pass out of the slammer, while demanding that innocent babies be given the death penalty?

How about Wackyland?

Yesserie, Bob, it's Wackyland, the hap'nen place where liberals are born and raised (by one parent), and where they return annually during the spawning season to collect their welfare checks, or whenever they feel like a need for weed.

Wackyland, where Common Core is taught; where laws are written at the stroke of a pen before you even know it, let alone see it; where you have to pay for your "free" health care.

Wackyland is where the nuts run the asylum; where the cops are in jail and the criminals run the courts; where the "feel-good" crowd insists on spending money someone else earned.  Where you can get sued because the "feel-good" crowd doesn't like your Christianity.

Wackyland, where a deserter from the battlefield is a hero.

You read that right: a deserter from the United States Army is a hero to the denizens of Wackyland.  This comes from the same mentality of the nut-jobs who spit on the soldiers returning home from Vietnam.  Go back in time about a year ago.  Corporal Bowe Bergdahl has been held captive four five years by the Taliban, then got swapped in a trade for five Gitmo detainees (terrorists, for those of you in Otisburg) in May, 2014.  National Security Advisor Susan Rice had this to say:

"He served the United States with honor and distinction..."

The Obama Adminstration states that the swap for the terrorists was "worth it".

And the soldiers who served...excuse me...Soldiers, with a capital "S"...served with the soldier Bergdahl, the individual who doesn't deserve that capital "S"?  They declared him a deserter from day one, when he decided on his own to leave his platoon (proven); abandon his weapons (proven); leave his gear in a nice pile (proven); send emails to family stating how he dislikes America (proven), and for their efforts they were branded LIARS from the looney left, aka the Adminstration.  Didn't another member of the Wackyland hall of shame - Jane Fonda - do the same thing to American servicemen returning from Vietnamese prison camps, when they complained of being tortured?

But wait, there's more.  Mullah Mohammad Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Abdul Haq Wasiq, Khairullah Khairkhwa and Mohammed Nabi Omari were the terrorists traded for the deserter.  Remember, these guys are the ones that were "worth it".  Battlefield commanders traded for a lowly corporal; terrorists committed to attacking and killing Americans traded for someone who deserted Americans.

But wait, there's a little bit more.   Guess what exploded in the Middle East last year?  Could it be ISIS?  And didn't ISIS include a few Americans in some head-chopping lessons?  And the special guest star - just one of the terrorists who was "worth it" - is Mullah Mohammed Fazi, who is right now in a leadership position within ISIS and happily engaged in mass slaughter, courtesy of the Obama Adminstration.

Really worth it?

Unfortunately for the denizens of Wackyland, smarter heads prevailed.  The Army has brought formal charges of desertion against Bergdahl, which makes Rice's "...served with honor and distinction" comment look incredibly stupid.  But that's the educational level of the liberal left: lots of fluff, no substance, heavy on the stupid sauce, and common sense thrown out the window.

But remember, this is Wackyland, that hap'nen place run by the looney left.  Facts just don't matter.

Sunday, March 22, 2015

The Liberal GooseStep

Liberals lie.
The real face of liberalism

That's an established fact.  There's no way around it either, except by exposure.  For example, in this video clip we see MSNBC host Rachel Maddow agrees with a guest on her show that kids are being executed in the United States by the bushel on a daily basis.  And then there's one liberal troll who played the part of a leech (aka parasite) kinda well decided to enter Conservapedia today, and he posted this:

"You are allowed to criticize Conservative only after you compose a million word essay on, in the case of Sam, how liberal Christianity is actually Satanism and, in the case of Augusto, why Conservative is not invoking Godwin's Law every time he associates you with Nazism because, after all, all German's are Nazis right? Also ask yourself this, of the 3 gentlemen mentioned above which is most likely to support the internment of a group, atheists, into camps to protect society?
What really riles Conservative is that an atheist wiki is totally ignoring him, worse, all his messages to Andy get the Schlafly ignore. It must be really depressing when one of the USA's biggest wingnuts thinks you're too extreme to warrant an answer."

Now, first, he signed it "I come from the Danish part."  Could have been addicted to pastries to the point of getting a new belt every week, but that's not the case.  Danish part of what?  Great Britain?  That's what is IP said, so it's not Denmark.

Now, it's hard to fathom how a guy could spout this nonsensical gibberish unless he's from a certain atheist wiki that also spouts a lot of nonsensical gibberish; I believe the place he refers to is Otisburg, which is a place inhabited by dimwits, halfwits, nitwits, nincompoops, and those who think they are intelligent but have their heads buried so deep where the sun don't shine that you need a government permit to shine a light on their brains.  What little they have, anyway.

So, here comes the latest one, calling himself "Seral", ostensibly after spilling his corn flakes on the cat this morning, and with some self-righteous authority spouts the above nonsense.  So, let's see what he missed...

First is the "liberal Christianity" part.

You're either a Christian, or you're not.  There's no middle ground.  So where does that leave liberals?  Liberals support those things that the Lord is against: abortion, evolution, atheism, hate, envy, adultery; just look at the news every day - that's the liberal news - for confirmation as to what liberals love, and absolutely none of it is biblical in nature. If they think otherwise, here's the Lord telling John in the Book of Revelation just what he thinks when a church mixes in with what would be called liberalism today:

And unto the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire, and his feet are like fine brass;
I know thy works, and charity, and service, and faith, and thy patience, and thy works; and the last to be more than the first.
Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.
And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.
And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.
But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, and which have not known the depths of Satan, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden.
But that which ye have already hold fast till I come. (Rev. 2:18-25)

And then there's the Nazis.  It's clear that Seral of the spilled corn flakes bowl is accusing one user of referring to another as a Nazi.  This is the Nazi Party platform of 1925.  Read it carefully.  Then compare it to the Fascist Manifesto of 1919, by Benito Mussolini.  Then compare both to the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx.

Kind of familiar?  The clowns of the so-called "Occupy Movement" a couple years back wanted the same thing, when they weren't defecating in cop cars or raping females or planning bridge destruction.  I guess those little liberals - and they are liberals, every one of them - goosestepped to the same tune as Marx and Il Duce and Der F├╝hrer.

And there's Seral's allegation about the camps.  And not the Boy Scout jamboree kind, either.  "Also ask yourself this, of the 3 gentlemen mentioned above which is most likely to support the internment of a group, atheists, into camps to protect society?"  He thinks that it is going to be conservative, Christian-types who will place into an internment camp a bunch of atheists, I guess to protect society.  Unfortunately for him, he's an inhabitant of Otisburg, that fun-filled place where the average "citizen" has the I.Q. of a carrot.  Which means they fail utterly in history.

Internment camps are also called concentration camps.  The Fascists of Italy had a version.  The Nazis also used a version known as death camps.  The Soviets had gulags.  The Chinese and North Koreans have theirs today; people get sent there for the "crime" of reading a Bible.

The people running these camps are atheistic; they couldn't care less about God at all.  And the sad part about it is that the liberal clowns from Otisburg come into Conservapedia spouting how bad us "wingnuts" are, but are just too dense to realize they have the Commie, Fascist, and Nazi manifestos sticking out of their own pockets, with a lot of underlining and happy-face stickers.

Perhaps they like the sound their jackboots make when they play gestapo. 

Friday, August 8, 2014

Liberalism is a Mental disorder: More Proof

During the past month from the time of this writing some 3,500 rockets were fired on Israeli targets by terrorists in Gaza.  The range of these rockets covers over 70% of Israel, and since they are terrorists pulling the trigger - the current war began when they kidnapped and killed three Israeli teens - everyone in Israel has a bulls-eye on their backs.


So, with that in mind, I give you two individuals who are the very definition of a mental disorder that is the hallmark of what a liberal is.  The first such man is Sigmund Freud.  You know him: the famous psychoanalyst and psychiatrist who practically invented both fields.  Two minutes on the couch in his office, and you're talking about your mother.

He's also the author of various works on the subject, but it's one of the last ones - Moses and Monotheism - that stands out.  Moses, according to Freud, was murdered by his own people after he had led them out of an unstable Egypt, and guilt over the murder led them to create a monotheistic religion which had at its end a Messiah, who in turn would make them all feel better.

Freud must be right; after all, he's smart; he's an atheist.

The second person is not as well known, but he probably spent some time on a couch talking about his mom; I won't say his name, but his initials spell out Markman.  Now, Markman - I can't for the life of me figure out whether or not his first name is Julius or Pinhas or Stanley or Fester - has a psych problem of his own.  He hates Conservapedia and will do anything to sabotage the site.  So he resorts to false info, parody, and anything similar, as well as doing those things that quite literally proves us to be right all along about liberals in general.  So he comes in as MexMax, does the damage, gets blocked; comes in as Markman, does the damage, gets blocked; comes back as Markoman, does damage, gets blocked; and so on with more socks; and he's telling us to "be very afraid."

Somehow I hear in the background that "cha-cha-cha-cha" whisper, from that cheap slasher flick with a killer wearing a hockey mask; every time I see Markman, I hear that sound.  Pass the popcorn.

"Be very...cha-cha-cha-cha-cha...afraid!" 

So, what does that have to do with these two individuals - one a shrink, the other needing his services - and Israel's current situation?  What does that have to do with having a mental disorder? 

Freud was Jewish, and he felt a need to disrespect his own people when he wrote Moses and Monotheism way back in Vienna, Austria.  Kristallnacht in Germany had just happened, tens of thousands of Jews were rounded up and put in concentration camps, and just around the corner was the Anschluss - the Nazi takeover of Austria.  You would think someone like Freud would get out of there in a hurry, but he concerned himself with that book of his instead, clamoring to get it published in England, where a rabbi there had to remind him as to what he escaped from.

And then there's Markman.  I am assuming he's also Jewish, but his actions against Conservapedia speak otherwise.  His IP was traced to an agricultural community in north-central Israel, where you would think that someone like him would try to make Israel a little better, but he won't.  He is too fixated on harming a small website because he likes parody a lot more than on paying attention as to what's coming down all around him, something that is doing damage to property and killing his people.

The missiles from from a bunch of terrorists in Gaza.

Liberalism is truly a mental disorder.

Monday, June 30, 2014

Talk About Incompetence!

The Mayor of Otisburg

The amateurs from Otisburg want attention.

Now, how do children want attention?

They whine!

"WAAAAAAHHHHHH!" they scream and wail and whine, continually for hours on end, until they get that binky rammed into their mouths or those diapers changed.  There's a lot of diapers that need to be changed in Otisburg.

Just check this little edit made on June 29, 2014, one of many repeated postings made by an Otisburg resident who first called himself EddyJ; apparently, he fell out of his bunk bed and wrote....

"Bunch of Pseudochristians spreading pseudoscience, racism, bigotry, xenophobic, lies, hatred and promoting usury. Ohh usury is a sin in your stupid dumb religion.

Earth is not (censored) 6,000 years old. Bunch of dumb rats.
Conservapedia hates freedom of speech and they're alarmist and insecure, typical republiKKKan behavior. They're bias based. You bash at wikipedia for being liberal when is not. You're the one who is bias-base and spreading lies and deceit with no source.
This porn war will not stop until you stop being hypocrites and bias. Christfag rednecks.

Stoping us is FUTILE. This wh0re karajou can't raise her fat behind to stop us. We want register to be halt so new account cannot be made." 

Stop me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this sound like the writings of a 7th grade drop-out?  6th grade maybe?  "We want register to be halt..."?  Just what is that?  Did he see a G.I. Joe cartoon one afternoon?  Did he see a register marching before Joe ordered "HALT!"?

Shouldn't registers sit on store counters? 
Typical cash register, Otisburg Gen'l Store.

And promoting usury?  Conservapedia promotes usury?  "Andy, did you make out any loans out to the unscrupulous citizens of Otisburg, with interest?  No?  How can they get past the 8th grade then?  And what'll they say to Maw?"

I wonder if Eddy knows what usury is; maybe he should stop at his favorite bank so he can refinance the loan for his trailer.  Otisburg has lots of trailers.  Some of them still have the tires on.

Eddy kind of reminds me of the little whiny liberal in this video.  A kid who fails to get smart (despite being in college!); a kid who tries to steal, tries to fight (like a girl!); tries having his way via a distorted personal viewpoint on what he thinks Christians should be (they must be "tolerant" of whiny liberal thieves!), but in the end he's shown the world that he's just a slobbering liberal blob of jelly who just doesn't know how to man-up:


Gotta have some attention, don't they?  

Now imagine that slobbering liberal, or some uneducated clown like Eddy, or some other resident from Otisburg, running about in the real world...and they're in charge of something.  Imagine something like...

Or Detroit.
Or Chicago.
Or the southern border of the United States.
Or the foreign policy of the United States.
Or the United States itself.

Talk about incompetence!

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Intellectual trailer trash

Dr. Jonathan Sarfati playing chess in Kansas.

In the past we at Conservapedia have put out evidence that the theory of evolution is nothing but hocus-pocus gobbledygook.  For the layman, those two words aptly describe the subject; for the researcher, the scientist, the investigator, the theory simply does not hold up to scrutiny.  Yet there are those out there that believe in it so much they not only will refuse to see the evidence against it, they will try their best to shut it down and shut up anyone who believes otherwise.  In fact, one desperate nutcase out of Melbourne, Australia is currently using DDoS attacks in an effort to shut down the site, all because he was not allowed to force his pro-evolution stance on us more than six years ago.

As I said, evolution does not hold up to scrutiny; when tested it fails.  The details presented in every textbook are based on dogma and assumption.  Their scenario goes something like this: "Here's the first known birdy, archaeopterix," one says, pointing to the fossilized remains of that little critter. "And if you look at these wings with their little claws on them, well that's proof that they came from a dinosaur."

"How do you know they came from a dinosaur?" asks one dissenter.

"Well, have to look at the bones here in the wrist."

"Then how come the pubic bone in the pelvis isn't pointing backwards?"

"Why you little #$^#^* peice of #%^%@$!!  How dare you interupt me teaching about our glorious ancestry with you #^%# little #^&&$# innuendoes and religious %$*^# garbage!"

"That's an come you can't see it?"

"Outta my classroom, you $^^$^% little &(*%$, and don't come back!"

And that's the way it is with the pro-evolution crowd.  Confront them with facts, and they go nuts.  They go into insults and name-calling.  Do they even bother to attempt to check up on their own assertions?  No.  Some years ago this writer had a conversation with an atheist online, who was dead-sure that Jesus was complete and total fiction.  He knew, he said, because he studied the history and archaeology of the Middle East intently during that particular period of time.  I asked him a pointed question: "Who was Josephus?"  He could not answer, because he didn't know.  I told him that if he indeed studied the history of the Middle East as he said he did he would have run smack-dab into Flavius Josephus, author of Antiquities of the Jews, the most-cited example of Biblical history and archaeology outside of the Bible itself...and he went ballistic when confronted with his own lack of education on the subject.  Went from being an imaginary scholar right to intellectual trailer trash.

Oh well.  So it goes.

And on the intellectual level we have scientists who have actually done an investigation into the matter, found out the results, and have had bulls-eyes painted on their backs ever since.  You would think that liberals - they do believe in liberty, don't they; it's where the word "liberalism" comes from - would be tolerant of such men and women, but since when do liberals believe in tolerance?  When it comes to God, the Bible, Christianity, and the Creation, liberals are the most intolerant of people on earth.  Case in point: Dr. Jonathan Sarfati.  Got his PhD from Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand (home of another anti-Conservapedia-hate-filled atheist); wrote many books and peer-reviewed scientific papers; and was the New Zealand chess champion.  he wrote Refuting Evolution, of which you could read a chapter here.  Now, you would think that such a man who thinks for himself (chess is a game for thinkers), who educated himself, who is a published writer would have a bit more respect in the scientific community, but no.  Liberals demand that you think their way, or you're toast.

And the name-calling?

The so-called "No Answers in Genesis" website calls him a "propagandist".
The "Creationist Idiocy" blog calls him the "moron of the month".
When he gave a lecture at the University of British Columbia, some attendees wore shirts which said  “Creationism: a Philosophy of Ignorance”.
A blogger with an over-use of the word "stupid" directed against him and other creationists in general.

And the "intellectuals" infesting Otisburg...what do they have to say about Dr. Sarfati?

"Jonathan Sarfati is an angry man who is a vocal proponent of Young Earth Creationism. Despite his own insistence on using logic he often resorts to emotional appeals and name calling."

Never-mind the fact that Otisburg is a place is filled with angry "men" who resort to emotional appeals and name calling against anyone for anything...but they wouldn't know what that was, would they?

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what intellectual trailer trash is all about.

Sunday, January 5, 2014

Mr. Transparency's "veteran" dad

Once upon a time there was a birth certificate.

This birth certificate belonged to Barack Hussein Obama.

We on the right claim it's a forged document, and we have empirical evidence that proves it.

The left of course will not even look at it, but they will call us every foul-mouthed name on the planet for having exposed it.  They believe that we are engaged in a conspiracy to discredit His Royal Husseiness, simply out of racism, hate, jealousy, ad nauseum.

Awwwwwwwww, poor babies!

So, what additional evidence is there that proves this birth certificate is the fraud that it is?  Hmmmm..what could there be?

How about something straight out of the mouth of His Remarkable Barackness?  Something that not even the royal wife Queen Michelle couldn't even spin straight...

He's on the campaign trail some two years ago, and this clip was covered by his boot-licking yes-men at CNN.  And by "boot-licking", well, just look at the shine on those shoes the next time you see him on the teevee (but that's another story).  In this clip he says we have to keep a "solemn pact" with our veterans, a group of men and women he's betraying right now.  And he's claiming as a "veteran" his father.

Yes, he says it point-blank.  His father was a "veteran" who fought in World War II, came home and got his veteran's benefits.

Now, first, let's do the math.  It's very simple math, so simple even a liberal can figure it out without a pocket calculator.

World War II was fought from 1939 to 1945.

The Royal Patrimonious, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was born in 1936, and he died in 1982. 

World War II was fought from 1939 to 1945.  Duke Barack the First was aged 3 when it began.

The Prince Regent Step-Patrimonius, Lolo Seotoro, was born in 1935, and died in 1987.

World War II was fought from 1939 to 1945.  Prince Lolo was aged 4 when it began.

So, unless General George "Blood and Guts" Patton had an elite toddler division to drop rattles, binkeys, and soiled diapers on the enemy, Mr. Transparency's dear-old dad never made it to the front lines.

And since both the dear-ol'dad and the semi-dear-ol'step-dad are both foreign nationals - one a Kenyan college student, the other something else in Indonesia - how could His Holy Transparentness claim he applied for and received veteran's benefits?  It was American veterans benefits he indicated in the above clip, wasn't it?

But of course the liberal left is going to spin this one into something else.  "Uhhh, he misspoke hisself" they'll scream.  "Uhhh, that's not what he said."  "Uhhh, Michelle said that."  "Uhhh, he was talking about his dog."  "Uhhh, we'll blame Bush for it."

It would just be so much easier for the liberal looney-tunes left to accept the fact that the Transparent One, Barack Hussein Obama, is nothing but a pathological liar who is screwing them over, as well as everyone else in the country.

Real veterans included.